Are Consent Apps a Good Thing? Consent has become more widely discussed on college campuses, but there’s still a lot of confusion on the topic. Talking about consent in college is important: 1 in 5 college women experience sexual assault and the majority of assaults go unreported, according to the New York Times. UpdateStar is compatible with Windows platforms. UpdateStar has been tested to meet all of the technical requirements to be compatible with Windows 10, 8.1, Windows 8. If you read Stellaluna as a child, chances are, you like bats. Who wouldn’t? These nocturnal cuties are full of cuddles. Sadly, they’re also teeming with disease.In 2. 01. 4, the Obama administration released a list of 5. In response, many colleges began adopting policies of affirmative consent, meaning that consent is to be voluntarily granted by all people engaging in an act. In other words, colleges are adopting a policy of “yes means yes” rather than “no means no.” With these new definitions of consent, many students are afraid of accusations of sexual assault while others are worried about being victims of it. How Consent Apps Work. Sa. Sie is an app that lets people consent to sexual acts with a contract. You open the app with your partner, read and sign a contract, take photos of your IDs, and save the contract with a password. This may seem odd, but its intention is to foster dialogue about sex and to encourage affirmative consent on college campuses. James Martin, a representative from Sa. Sie, explains: The contract in our app says, in essence, that each student agrees to respect the ongoing nuances of each other’s consent, and that they agree to gain and grant affirmative consent from each other on an ongoing basis, follow their school’s affirmative consent policies while conducting their relationship, and communicate with their other partner the second that consent changes. The parties agree that when that consent changes, they will terminate the contract with the other party using our termination button to end the contract. The organization Empowering Victims has created a trio of apps designed to be used as conversation starters in the ongoing debate over consent: We- Consent (which has users record videos of themselves consenting), What- About- No (which has users show their partners a video of a police officer telling them “no” while being recorded), and I’ve- Been- Violated (which has people record video and audio of themselves to “collect evidence” after an assault occurs). These apps aren’t meant for practical use—instead, they provoke discussion.“What we have as a goal is to foster an environment and set of behaviors where assumptions are not made, but instead there is a dialogue between the prospective partners,” said Michael Lissack, Executive Director of Empowering Victims. And according to Jaclyn Friedman, author of Yes Means Yes: Visions of Sexual Power, even the conversation- starting Empowering Victims apps are wrong- headed.“I’m all for fostering dialogue about consent — it’s a big part of my job— but these apps are fostering a wrong and dangerous conversation, one that posits consent as irrevocable once given, and applying to any and all sex acts someone might want to force on you, once you’ve consented to . Friedman says: Juries tend to look for any reason to disbelieve victims, and . In reality, victims often freeze up and say nothing. Under this standard, participants have no responsibility to pay attention to their partner’s body language or participation levels. If their partner has consented to something and then freezes up or disassociates and is just laying there, according to this contract, it’s cool to keep doing whatever to them. This is barbaric, and it’s not how affirmative consent works. It should be noted that consent apps aren’t prevalent on college campuses.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
August 2017
Categories |